<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OSGi Declarative Services Tooling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/03/osgi-declarative-services-tooling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/03/osgi-declarative-services-tooling/</link>
	<description>Eclipse Equinox OSGi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Aniszczyk</title>
		<link>http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/03/osgi-declarative-services-tooling/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Aniszczyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/?p=577#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Boris, we didn&#039;t use JFace Databinding for the tooling in the SDK. The main reason was that we reused a lot of the existing PDE editor framework code which doesn&#039;t use databinding. However, in the PDE Incubator (thanks to Benjamin Cabe), we have started work on what the DS editor would look like if it was fully based on EMF + Databinding:

http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/pde-incubator/modeling/plugins/

My goal is to move most if not all of PDE&#039;s editors to this approach in the e4 timeframe. I want to use EMF to manage the model and different versions of that model. I want to use Databinding to help build the UI for that model... in effect saving a lot of boilerplate code. Expect a future blog post on the awesomeness in terms of code savings and other cool things with this approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boris, we didn&#8217;t use JFace Databinding for the tooling in the SDK. The main reason was that we reused a lot of the existing PDE editor framework code which doesn&#8217;t use databinding. However, in the PDE Incubator (thanks to Benjamin Cabe), we have started work on what the DS editor would look like if it was fully based on EMF + Databinding:</p>
<p><a href="http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/pde-incubator/modeling/plugins/" rel="nofollow">http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/pde-incubator/modeling/plugins/</a></p>
<p>My goal is to move most if not all of PDE&#8217;s editors to this approach in the e4 timeframe. I want to use EMF to manage the model and different versions of that model. I want to use Databinding to help build the UI for that model&#8230; in effect saving a lot of boilerplate code. Expect a future blog post on the awesomeness in terms of code savings and other cool things with this approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Bokowski</title>
		<link>http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/03/osgi-declarative-services-tooling/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Bokowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/?p=577#comment-645</guid>
		<description>Did you use data binding for the new editor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you use data binding for the new editor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

