<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Zesty e4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/02/a-zesty-e4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/02/a-zesty-e4/</link>
	<description>Eclipse Equinox OSGi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:17:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Karam</title>
		<link>http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/02/a-zesty-e4/comment-page-1/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator>David Karam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/?p=587#comment-1358</guid>
		<description>A web-enabled Zest is a fantastic validation of the SWT Browser Edition! Thank you for publishing your work. Just curious, what is the file size of the compiled SWF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A web-enabled Zest is a fantastic validation of the SWT Browser Edition! Thank you for publishing your work. Just curious, what is the file size of the compiled SWF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Aniszczyk</title>
		<link>http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/02/a-zesty-e4/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Aniszczyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/?p=587#comment-634</guid>
		<description>I would say go for it Ian... as Boris says, this could kickstart a discussion in splitting up JFace in relevant pieces. If I recall, I believe Tom Schindl was also interested in splitting up JFace for some of his UFaceKit work.

Cool stuff btw!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say go for it Ian&#8230; as Boris says, this could kickstart a discussion in splitting up JFace in relevant pieces. If I recall, I believe Tom Schindl was also interested in splitting up JFace for some of his UFaceKit work.</p>
<p>Cool stuff btw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/02/a-zesty-e4/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/?p=587#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Thanks Boris.

Should I post this to the e4-dev list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Boris.</p>
<p>Should I post this to the e4-dev list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Bokowski</title>
		<link>http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/03/02/a-zesty-e4/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Bokowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/?p=587#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Cool! Bringing this to e4 would be great. We need to start the conversation about how JFace needs to be split into separate pieces, so that you can get more of Zest working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! Bringing this to e4 would be great. We need to start the conversation about how JFace needs to be split into separate pieces, so that you can get more of Zest working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

